Monday, September 22, 2008

Healthy Eating at Harvard

Many of us are mindful of what we eat, but unsure what to believe when the daily news includes conflicting coverage about food and health. There is the USDA Food Pyramid, which, as children, we learned as the model for good eating; however various special interest groups influence it.

Fortunately, at Harvard we have the pre-eminent School of Public Health, which has released the Healthy Eating Pyramid and is what we use as our guiding principle in making menus.

According to HSPH, “When it comes down to it, the best advice on what to eat is relatively straightforward: Eat a plant-based diet rich in fruits, vegetables, and whole grains; choose healthy fats, like olive and canola oil; and red meat and unhealthy fats, like saturated and trans fats, sparingly.”
As a complement to the Healthy Eating Pyramid, they summarize “Eight Tips for Eating Right:
  • “Choose good carbs, not no carbs. Whole grains are your best bet.
  • “Pay attention to the protein package. Fish, poultry, nuts, and beans are the best choices.
  • “Choose healthy fats, limit saturated fat, and avoid trans fat. Plant oils, nuts, and fish are the healthiest sources.
  • “Choose a fiber-filled diet, rich in whole grains, vegetables, and fruits.
  • “Eat more vegetables and fruits. Go for color and variety—dark green, yellow, orange, and red.
  • “Calcium is important. But milk isn't the only, or even best, source.
  • “Moderate drinking can be healthy—but not for everyone. You must weigh the benefits and risks.
  • "A daily multivitamin is a great nutrition insurance policy. Some extra vitamin D may add an extra health boost.”
While the HUDS menu attempts to address most of these tips (sorry, no beer tap is in the works for the beverage station, and we will not be getting a vitamin dispenser), we will never limit your menu choices to just these things. People have a variety of tastes and needs, and I’m the first to admit that cookies play an important role in my life sometimes.

That said, good carbs, lean proteins, healthy fats, no trans fats, and lots of veggies and fruits are available. HSPH declines to specify portions or calories, but notes that moderation is the cornerstone of wellbeing.

Which leads to nutrition information on the menu cards. Many of you have inquired about the decision to remove nutrition information. As you know, HUDS consulted with University Health Services, the Bureau of Study Counsel, and the College, about limiting nutrition data to the kiosks and web. Specifically, we needed to address the challenge a quiet and surprisingly large contingent of our community faces with eating disorders. Those individuals can place an undue emphasis on calories and other literal food values, making their placement over every food item a real challenge. Thus, we did what we felt best addressed the special health needs of those individuals, much as we support people with food allergies or religious dietary preferences.

For those who would like assistance with shaping a healthy approach to food, Harvard does have nutritional counseling available through University Health Services and support groups available with the Bureau of Study Counsel. And as always, we’ll continue to work with individuals who have special dietary needs, be they allergies, religious guidelines, or political preferences such as vegetarianism. And as always, we continue to forge ahead on the sustainability of our menus (See the sustainability report at http://www.dining.harvard.edu/about_HUDS/sustainability.html).

To that end, don’t forget: sign up for the Ward’s Berry Farm trip this Friday. Spots are filling in a hurry, so email crista_martin@harvard.edu to save your spot!

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

The salad mixing bowl tonight was great- is there any way that at least the houses could have that on a daily basis?

Anonymous said...

Dear Mr. Mayer,

I am a Junior at the College in Quincy House. I understand the basic rationale behind the change is a concern over eating issues, nevertheless I believe that the lack of information is not right. Harvard should provide better counseling services for those with eating disorders, rather than restrict information for others. Much of the food that HUDS provides (especially its prepared meals) is unexpectedly high in fat and calories, and I think students have a right to know that. Meals are too rushed and last-minute for online information to actually be practical. Healthy eating in part must come from knowing what goes into the food. It may not be possible to make this change, however I urge you to consider it. Thank you very much.

Anonymous said...

Hi,

I'm agreed with the person above. I don't have time to go to HUDS's website, and at least in Lowell the kiosks only helpfully display a definition of some new pasta sauce. At least put nutrition facts permanently on the TV screen in the servery. (But this still won't address the fact that, at the end of the night, entrees often vary wildly as the kitchen runs out of the originally planned dishes. What are you going to do for us then?)

Besides, I'm pretty sure Harvard has a much larger contingent of overweight people, athletes, or girls like me with wretchedly slow metabolisms who need to keep tabs on calories and fats. You're going to deprive us of our ability to eat healthily because some people don't eat enough? Sure, we can follow your tips and eat whole grains (and some of your 40,000 pounds of squash), but that doesn't make up for the fact that we have no idea what unhealthy dishes to watch out for.

Thanks for considering this.

Anonymous said...

Hi,
I have to disagree with the people above because, first of all, the nutrition information is very hard to discern to begin with if it's in "ounces", which no one--at least that I have met--can visually potion onto their plate. 4 oz of lasagne, for instance? I have no idea. However, 400 calories in a bagel I can clearly see. Thus, the nutrition information never really struck a chord wit me other than "ballpark" figures--I.E. low-calorie broth based soup and vegetables, high calorie pizza--and itemized foods (cookies). I even doubt many of us know how many calories we are "supposed" to consume in a day--and it varies by age, athletic level, size, etc. Perhaps you could make a move to "highlight" good choices (either for calcium content or protein etc)...

I doubt that we are being "deprived" of the ability to eat healthily without nutrition facts staring us in the face. For example, there was never nutritional info on the salad bar, and yet that's always healthy food. Hmm...

Also, this is a small point to the poster above me, but you "don't have time" to go to the website for nutrition info, yet you are reading (and commenting on) the online blog?

Thanks Mr. Mayer for your consideration.

Anonymous said...

I feel like people with eating disorders are probably already checking the website, so getting rid of the cards only hurts people who want rough guidelines of which options are better--sometimes I'm really surprised by which menu item is lower in fat or calories or even sodium, and I would have denied myself something I'd slightly prefer for something I thought was healthier had I not seen there that the "healthy" option actually wasn't! The oz guidelines aren't useful in the absolute, but for comparing things they're still somewhat helpful. Glancing at the cards is much less embarrassing than navigating from the screens, too... I don't need people to see me comparing the mac and cheese to the chicken fingers to figure out which is less bad for me. :) Those screens are very big, bright, and public.

Anonymous said...

On the topic of healthy food, I love curly fries, any way to get them into the D-halls?

Anonymous said...

My house used to have this low cal Arnold's whole grain bread, but I haven't seen it in the past few weeks. Could we continue to get this bread?

Anonymous said...

Big shout out to the pfoho dining hall chefs who have made incredible grilled vegetables for the last couple of days! Thanks guys!

Anonymous said...

Dear Mr. Mayer,

While I understand the rationale behind removing the calorie cards, I feel it might be a bit short-sighted. While I personally know several people who suffer from eating disorders, and am aware that it is a complex, mutli-faceted disease, I am equally well aware of the growing overweight and obese population in this country. People who are struggling with their weight, or are trying to lose weight, are already fighting an uphill battle - why make it harder for them? While the cards were not perfect (it is, admittedly, hard to determine was 4 oz is compared to 2 oz, and they do not make distinctions between good and bad carbs, etc.), that was never the point - the point was convenience. You could simply look up and make an instant decision on whether or not something is "worth it;" it's about deciding how much you really want something.

Without the cards, if someone wants to eat healthy, he or she will have to go online before eating and literally plan out his meal. That takes the fun and enjoyment out of food, in my opinion.

Why not compromise: I suggest that, for every meal, HUDS post in a convenient area of each dining hall the nutritional information of that meal's menu. That way, the people who don't want to know don't have to look, and for those who do, it's just a few steps away from the food.

I hope HUDS reconsiders it's decision to remove the calorie cards, as I think they ultimately did much more good than bad. Thank you.

Anonymous said...

I am a Senior here at Harvard and I am really disappointed with the decision to take away the nutrition cards. While I certainly agree that we should be sensitive to the needs of people with eat disorders, I think HUDS is ignoring a rather large portion of the Harvard community that struggles with weight gain. Eating a 600 calorie sandwich and 2 200 calorie cookies can give a woman over half of her recommended calorie allowance for the day. But of course, who thinks of that when grabbing a bagel with cream cheese and a few cookies?

Poor dietary habits and associated weight gain and chronic disease are at ridiculous proportions in the United States, hence the mandate that all NYC restaurants make public and visible their nutrition facts. HUDS needs to be accountable for the meals that they prepare, and not on some website. It needs to be reasonably accessible.
If students have eating disorders, they need to learn to have healthy relationships with food, not be sheltered from the reality of what they are eating. Nutrition labels are everywhere, on cereal boxes, on candy bars...because at some point someone decided that people deserved to know what they were eating.


If you want to make your main options pizza, fried chicken and biscuits, and put less appetizing options in the salad bar...fine. But at least tell the truth about what is in the food.

Daniel Carroll said...

The paninis were my favorite lunches last year (especially the chicken pesto + the grilled vegetable), but I haven't seen them this year! Will they be coming back soon?

Anonymous said...

Dear Mr. Mayer,

You covered most of the health bases there, but you left out one thing: low sugar. HUDS doesn't offer that many low sugar offerings for, say, the cereals. And the desserts are frequently overloaded with sugar--they can definitely have less. Would it be possible for the Dining Services to offer some more low sugar options?

Thanks. You folks are doing a fantastic job!

Anonymous said...

Ditto anonymous at 11:09. Also, there actually aren't as many options as there would seem:

* “Pay attention to the protein package. Fish, poultry, nuts, and beans are the best choices.

So that means basically chicken from the grille, tuna (mercury every day!), tofu, and eggs (without the egg-yolk). Having to improvise meals out of those base ingredients every day with limited sides (and no kitchen) is tricky.

* “Choose healthy fats, limit saturated fat, and avoid trans fat. Plant oils, nuts, and fish are the healthiest sources.

What oils are used in the prepared foods? As a side note, some of the vegetables appear to be unnecessarily heavy in oil--that seems less healthy... (Even if they were cooked in EVOO, if they're *drenched* in EVOO, it's going to be less healthy than if less EVOO were used)

Also, there aren't many nuts available during dinner...

Having fish once a week is definitely a plus, but it's sometimes served in ways that decrease its healthiness (e.g. it's cooked in creams or is fried).

Just trying to pass along some opinions. Thanks!

PS Ditto on the nutrition cards.

Matthew said...
This comment has been removed by the author.